Typical Trainer Subpersonalities
John Cullen
A reflection on blocks to growth
A major purpose of the self-actualizing trainer is to facilitate the growth
of the participants in the training program. However, this purpose can be
sabotaged by the personal concerns of the trainer. There can be many
unconscious motives influencing the trainer which undermine his or her
effectiveness. It is important for the trainer to become aware of these
saboteurs and to take steps to minimize their influence. These are
subpersonalities or subselves which have different needs from the purpose of
the self-actualizing trainer. The following is an example of a workshop
conducted for psychosynthesis trainers and interns to identify and resolve
the negative consequences of these subpersonalities.
The main purpose of this session was to identify typical subpersonalities
which influenced the training situation. Participants shared their
experiences with different subpersonalities, and an exercise was conducted
to develop qualities needed by subpersonalities and to develop a will
statement. Preparation: IAMOP Monograph No. 4-6 The Self Actualizing
Manager.
Typical Subpersonalities
1. Insecurity
2. Demander
3. Fanatic
4. Nice Guy
5. Defender
6. Know-It-All
7. Critic
8. Imposer
9. Bureaucrat
10. Play-It-Loose
11. Detailer/Lecturer
12. Manipulator
13. Abstractionist
14. Conflicter
15. Overdependent
16. Competitor
1. Insecurity
One of the first subpersonalities to emerge when you conduct your first
workshop is INSECURITY. You feel that you are inadequate and lack the
knowledge and experience to lead a workshop. This subpersonality
doesn't take any risks and uses protective devices. The basic quality
is lack of confidence. There is little use of one's own intuition. The
effects of this subpersonality can be diminished by your own experience
as a trainee by fully involving oneself in the psychosynthesis process.
All interns have had at least three psychosynthesis workshops over the
period of a year. This is an excellent foundation and a basic
requirement to enter into intern training. IAMOP has workbooks for each
of the workshops which provide structured cognitive information and
standard exercises. The Organizer type is prone to adopt this
subpersonality.
2. Demander
A major subpersonality that affects trainers is the DEMANDER. Will
types tend to overuse this subpersonality. Demands are made on the
students to "get it" or "do it my way." The trainer needs to release
these demands through the practice of unconditional love.This does not
mean that you can't have agreements and understandings with the
participants regarding the process of the workshop. There are times
when it may be necessary to ask participants to leave when your
intuition is that they may not receive any benefit from the workshop
because of their particular value system or they are deliberately or
unconsciously sabotaging the workshop. These rare events are best dealt
with on a one-to-one basis. In no way should the trainer put down the
participant but rather seek for a synthesis on the needs of the
individual and the goals of the workshop. One example is a person who
has an extensive metaphysical background but has not grounded her
metaphysical insights. She was attuned to the higher aspects of
psychosynthesis but not on the practical everyday applications. Her
comments in the class were primarily insightful at this higher level
but consisted of quotes from her guru. She was disruptive in the sense
that she attempted to impose her belief system on the other members of
the group. Her attitude was that there was nothing here for her to
learn. Realizing this situation, the trainers disidentified from the
Demander subpersonality and worked out a mutually satisfactory
solution. In this case the student was able to drop out of the group
and at the same time pursue an independent study more compatible with
her needs.
Another case where the need to disidentify from the Demander
subpersonality occurred when a management team attended a workshop, but
after several sessions it was learned that several of them were there
because the president of the organization required them to be there. In
addition, several of them were of a fundamentalist religion which
accepted only the teachings of the Bible and not their own inner
wisdom. Their participation in the workshop was primarily sharing
biblical quotes. Again it was necessary to disidentify from the
Demander subpersonality and allow them to leave graciously which they
were happy to do. As a side issue, it is important that participants in
psychosynthesis workshops do so on a self-selective basis. To be
required to attend is a serious ethical issue as many managers are not
ready to experience the level of consciousness that psychosynthesis can
provide. In general. the average manager, without any prior knowledge
of psychosynthesis profits from the workshops. All that you can do is
offer what you have as a smorgasbord. People will take what they want.
You can't cram it down people's throat. Demands are not solely directed
toward students. The facilitator may have demands on the
co-facilitator.
It is important to realize that this does not negate agreements and
particularly standards. These agreements and standards need to be made
explicit at the beginning of the workshop. This is particularly
important in the academic environment where grades are a significant
factor.
3. Nice Guy
This subpersonality is the opposite of the Demander. In this case the
trainer does not set significant challenges for the students. It can
work with the Insecurity subpersonality to lower standards and can be
motivated by a need to be liked or to obtain acceptance of the program.
Love types are more apt to identify with this subpersonality.
4. Fanatic
This subpersonality is overenthusiastic about psychosynthesis. It is a
characteristic of the Devotional type. The subpersonality believes that
psychosynthesis is going to save the world. It rejects any
non-acceptance of psychosynthesis and values individuals based upon
their attachment to psychosynthesis. It is exclusive rather than
inclusive. It denies the inclusive nature of psychosynthesis.
5. Defender
This subpersonality is similar to the Fanatic. It defends
psychosynthesis from all attacks. We do not need to defend anything.
Psychosynthesis is not the grand solution to all of the world's
problems. It is a good approach, but there is no need to defend its
spiritual nature, fuzziness or its models.
6. Know-It-All
This subpersonality has an overevaluated image of itself. The
subpersonality has an answer to all questions. It is infallible. It
does not know how to say "I don't know."
7. Critic
The Critic is familiar to everyone. In the training situation it may
involve criticizing oneself, the co-facilitator or the students. There
is a fine line between the critic and the guide. When criticism is
occurring between two or more people, the guide attempts to synthesize
the remarks of the opposing parties. The guide intuitively can sort out
the positives for each point of view. An attitude of healing prevails.
8. Imposer
The Imposer subpersonality tends to be an overidentification with the
individual will. It is closely related to the demander subpersonality.
Its main characteristic is inflexibility and the imposition of ideas.
Aligned with the Know-It-All, a destructive non-accepting atmosphere
can be created.
9. Bureaucrat
This subpersonality is related to the Insecurity subpersonality.
Planning is essential in the training program, but the Bureaucrat
overplans and leaves little to chance, spontaneity nor the intuition.
The Organizer type is particularly prone to identify with this
subpersonality. The major quality that this subpersonality needs to
develop is flexibility.
10. Play-It-Loose
This subpersonality is the opposite of the bureaucrat. It is a prime
characteristic of the Beauty type. Spontaneity and intuition are its
main manifestations. However, these qualities, admirable as they are,
can create a chaotic atmosphere. A synthesis of the Bureaucratic and
Play-It-Loose subpersonalities is one of the characteristics of an
effective trainer.
11. Detailer/Lecturer
This subpersonality overloads its audience with facts. There is very
little interaction with the audience. The Scientist types tend to
identify with this subpersonality. Their primary mode of presentation
is through dry lectures. This trainer subpersonality is comfortable
with other scientist types and vice-versa but tends to turn off other
types. The style is similar to the bureaucrat and lacks the spontaneity
and intuition so necessary in the training environment. Details are
important and often necessary, but an overreliance on it tends to
satisfy the mental ego-needs of the presenter but is of little value in
the psychosynthesis environment.
12. Manipulator
This is a major subpersonality of the Practical/Active type. Trickery,
deviousness, secrecy are its main characteristics. An overemphasis on
the material aspects of the training and a lowered emphasis on the
transpersonal aspects is typical. There can be a hidden agenda which is
not shared with the co-facilitator or with the participants.
13. Abstractionist
This subpersonality loves to deal in the abstract. Ideas and concepts
are presented with little grounding. Participants find it difficult to
relate the material to their everyday life. Ideals may be presented in
such as manner as to preclude any practical benefit. The Devotional
type is prone to this subpersonality.
14. Conflicter
This subpersonality thrives in conflicting with participants or the
co-facilitator. Its attitude is either/or rather than "and". This is
often a combination of the Harmony through Conflict type and the Will
type. Sides tend to be chosen up. This subpersonality will enter into
arguments with students rather than demonstrating the possibility of
synthesis. The most destructive situation is between the two
co-facilitators when they are visibly conflicting with each other. An
example is when an intern due to identification with any of the above
subpersonalities creates a conflicting situation with one or more of
the participants, and as a result the trainer needs to heal the
situation at the time.
15. Overdependent
This subpersonality relates primarily to an intern who is overdependent
on the trainer. The demand is that the trainer make all of the
decisions. A common verbalization is "Tell me what to do." This
overdependence can block the growth of the intern if the trainer
reinforces this behavior. Obviously, the trainer has more experience,
and the intern will necessarily be dependent in the early stages.
However, more and more the intern needs to develop a more independent
and collaborative relationship with the trainer.
Another situation is where the trainer becomes overdependent upon the
intern and may give too much responsibility before the intern is ready.
In this case the trainer abdicates his or her responsibility for the
program. There is a fine line between trusting the intern to do the
right thing and allowing free rein where the intern may create
exercises which are beyond the capability of the participants to
understand or to perform.
16. Competitor
The situation usually occurs between the trainer and the intern. They
compete with each other. One case is where the trainer sees the intern
as a threat and looking better, or the intern wants to show that she or
he is smarter and more knowledgeable than the trainer. This is
extremely destructive. The antidote is for each party to rejoice when
either demonstrates exceptional behavior. This subpersonality can also
emerge by competing with students.
Summary: Blocks To Growth
These are some examples of blocks to trainer growth. There are many more and
each trainer needs to identify his or her own personal blocks. It needs to
be emphasized that these blocks which are expressed as subpersonalities
represent an exaggeration of basic human needs. We all need to express our
will, be loved, be active, and creative and seek harmonious relationships,
to use our minds to analyze situations, be devoted to some ideal and to
organize our activities in a meaningful form. The problem is that many
overdo these needs so that they become our primary identifications. There is
an alienation from the self.
Subpersonality Exercise
1. Identify the block and affirm that you wish to transform it into a
positive quality.
2. Through the use of the creative imagination go back to a situation
where this block was operating. Observe yourself in this situation and
assess the consequences to you and others when this block occurred.
3. Allow an image to emerge that represents this block and carry on a
dialogue with it.
4. Assume that there is a place within you that knows all about you and is
concerned with your growth. You can represent this as a wise loving
teacher or any other appropriate symbol. Ask for a quality that you
need to develop to deal with this block.
5. Once you have the quality and/or a symbol ground it by writing it down
on a 3x5 card or draw it.
6. Develop a plan of action to bring this quality into your life.
Sharing Subpersonality Exercise
Joan
My main subpersonality was the WORRY WART. This is an aspect of the critic
and insecurity. It says things such as, "I'll be awful. Whatever I am going
to do isn't going to work." "I'm afraid that people will find out how little
I know". This particular subpersonality manifests itself in a physical
symptoms such as headaches, cold hands and feet, and upset stomach. I never
eat before a workshop. My lower unconscious enters by producing bizarre
dreams. I also have stage fright. One positive aspect of this subpersonality
is that it makes me over-prepare. I also tend to run a lot of mental dress
rehearsal. Also, a certain amount of energy seems to come out of worrying. I
am able to channel this energy in such a way that no one knows what I have
gone through. What I am doing appears to be effortless. I am "acting as if."
When working with this subpersonality, I came up with a new evocative word
which is CONFIDENCE. What this subpersonality needs is reassurance. Several
things that work for me, when I look back on when I first started, is to
meditate quietly and let the light from the Higher Self stream down into me
and to really control my breathing deeply. I do this right before the
workshop. This evokes a sense of calmness. The other thing I use is
nurturing and reassuring this subpersonality. I remind it of past successes
with teaching. Lastly, the more organized I am able to get, the less
worrying I do. As I had more experience, this subpersonality became less of
a factor, but it is still there in a modified form, and I still do the above
and channel it into being excellent.
Discussion
This is one of the most common subpersonalities even for experienced
trainers. Any time that we face a new situation, such as a group with which
we have had no experience or introducing new material for the first time, it
may appear. We are not certain because it is an uncertain situation and the
Worry Wart thrives in these situations.
This subpersonality emerges also when you experience not getting any
response from the participants. Every trainer needs some nourishment and
response from the participants. You cannot demand a response, but at the
same time you can experience an emptiness within yourself which can evoke
this subpersonality.
An effective way of dealing with subpersonalities is to be thoroughly
familiar with the Laws of the Skillful Will. We realize the nature of our
system in the body, emotions, mind and imagery affect each other in such a
way that a change in one part of the system affects the other parts. We
normally work with imagery to change thoughts, feelings and actions. In the
"acting as if" process we change our body to affect our thoughts, feelings
and images. The use of mudras based upon certain Eastern thoughts can be
helpful. Connecting the thumb and index fingers can facilitate the
intuition. Open palms can stimulate receptivity, etc.
Scott
I worked with the PRESUPPOSER which is the flip side of the Worry Wart. This
is an overconfident subpersonality. You think that you know everything. You
presuppose that you are going to be able to dump all of the information that
you have and that most of the people are going to understand what you am
talking about. I will just go in and start unloading without looking at the
audience to get feedback on what is happening to the people. This is a
frustrating situation for the trainer and the audience. Both can experience
a sense of failure.
Discussion
It is important to be aware of the level of knowledge, consciousness and
background of the audience. Many psychosynthesis concepts are beyond the
experience level of the audience. Therefore, the trainer needs to step down
some of the concepts so that the participants can relate to them in a
meaningful way. Individuals on the lower levels of the Maslow hierarchy
would have a difficult time relating experientially to self-actualization.
We have to start where they are and move to the next level. This is
difficult when the participants have diverse levels of consciousness. The
trainer needs to utilize all of his or her skills, particularly the
intuition to honor these different levels. IAMOP has been fortunate that
most of the participants in our workshops are at the self-esteem level.
Their next steps in growth would be self-actualization with an emphasis on
centering, self-identification and extensive subpersonality work. To move
directly to the transpersonal would be inappropriate as well as
concentrating on the lower unconscious with a therapeutic approach.
Judy
The subpersonality I worked with was TOTAL STAGE FRIGHT. Everything that I
know, everything I have studied, will not be enough to be successful. "I
can't teach anything to anybody." I experience being mentally fractured. My
feelings are very unsure and unsteady with butterflies in my stomach. This
subpersonality says "You are going to screw up." My behavior can be
catatonic where I am absolutely paralyzed or manic with excessive moving
around. The subpersonality also can assume a regal posture. I disidentify
from this subpersonality by identifying with that part of me who knows that
I can do it. I begin thinking as to how I can best achieve the objective. My
feelings center on what the group needs. My motives center on the thoughts
of how I can help the group. My behavior is much more interactive. My will
statement is "I will fearlessly use all of my equipment to serve the best
that I can."
Rob
I started with the idea of insecurity such as the WORRY WART. I went back to
a time when I was in this position and what went through my mind. The
questions emerged such as, "Have I prepared enough?" "Will they like me?"
"Am I dressed funny?" "Am I babbling?" and "Am I being helpful?" If I am
real insecure, I will walk a lot. I also drop my mouth. A lot of this
behavior relates to focusing on me and self-orientation.
Another behavior is the desire to overaccommodate. This stems from the
concern about stirring up things. I wish to avoid conflict. Another behavior
is physical isolation from the class. The core of these behaviors seems to
be the concern for inclusion and acceptance. This relates to my
self-orientation. This relates to my theory of education in that we are all
learning, and I want to be part of this learning.
The quality that I need to draw on is WILL. I took a trip up the mountain
and talked with the wise old man. He was holding a cross. A stream of yellow
light was coming out from the center of the cross. What I got out of this
was my ups and downs. I know that I need to use my will more. I need to do
more preparation than I do. I also need to use my will to stop talking
sooner than later. I will overexplain.
My affirmation was, "I am focused on both of our needs and I choose to focus
on them."
Another technique I use is to visualize a sun over the heads of the
students. By focusing on this positive energy, it takes away the negative
energy.
Discussion
Visualizing the light over the heads of the students is a good preparation.
Prior to the meeting do the cone meditation where you visualize the light
over the heads of each member and then make triangular connections with each
member. The connecting lines of light form the base of a large cone. The
lights from each member flow upward to the apex of the cone to form a group
light. As energy follows thought, you have already made a transpersonal
connection with the group and focused on group purpose. In an advanced
workshop you could encourage the participants to perform this exercise.
Being an effective trainer involves using the creative process. You prepare
by doing your homework. You deal with the frustration phase when
subpersonalities emerge. Then you let it go. You incubate. You stop thinking
about the workshop. Then allow your intuition to emerge during the
illumination phase and then use your mind which has stored all of your
knowledge to integrate with your intuition. Teaching becomes a creative
process. You are not simply regurgitating what you know but rather
responding in the here and now with what you know inspired by your
intuition.
The intuition will tell you what to use and what not to use. Even if you are
well prepared with many notes, your intuition may tell you to chuck them for
the moment and use what your intuition tells you to do. This can be
frustrating for an intern. The program has been planned, and it has been
determined who is going to do what. Out of the blue the trainer changes the
agenda based upon some insights that may have occurred in a meditation just
prior to the workshop. The intern needs to develop the ability to deal with
the dynamic process that occurs in psychosynthesis workshops.
It is important for the trainer and the intern to meet prior to the workshop
session, not only to go over the plan of the evening but also to establish a
transpersonal connection.
John
The subpersonality that I worked on deals with the relationship between the
trainer and the intern. This subpersonality is nonconfrontive with the
intern. The relationship between the trainer and the intern is quite
complex. They are usually friends and the trainer has served as teacher or
mentor role with the intern. There is a concern not to hurt the feelings of
the intern nor to disturb the relationship. Feedback is not given when
feedback needs to be given. The subpersonality is an avoider of disagreement
or an appeaser. It passes over things that need to be discussed. The needs
of the intern become more important than the intern training process.
This subpersonality may disrupt the selection process for interns by
admitting individuals as interns who should not be in the program. Their
skills lie somewhere else. If this is not confronted, the intern may
experience failure or worse create a negative role model which can have
unfortunate effects on the psychosynthesis program.
Transforming this subpersonality requires the development and integration of
all three aspects of the will - the strong will, the skillful will and the
good will. This is a major requirement for all trainers and interns.
Early identification of subpersonalities that block the trainer can
facilitate the training process. The following chapters will discuss twelve
principles of the self-actualizing trainer. In many cases the reader may
experience a variety of subpersonalities with the exercises associated with
each of the principles.